Bryan keon cohen biography samples
•
Guide to the Papers of Bryan Keon-Cohen: the Mabo Case
Plaintiffs' statement of Facts (File Volume 1)
Annexure D. Murray Island Records - Land Cases (File Volume 2)
Annexure D. Murray Island records - Wills, Land Transactions, Miscellaneous (File Volume 3)
Plaintiffs' statements of Facts: Source Documents (File Volume 4)
Preliminary materials and early draft documents (File Volume 5)
Correspondence and memoranda between counsel and other interested parties, 1982-1991 (File Volume 6)
Killoran materials, 1982 (File Volume 7)
Greg McIntyre Affidavit and Exhibits, 1982 (File Volume 8)
Pleading and essential court documents, 1982-1987 (File Volume 9)
High Court Interlocutory Applications and Negotiations, 1982-1986 (File Volume 10)
Discovery, notices etc., 1985-1989 (File Volume 11)
Plaintiffs' witness statements (A): drafts and research notes (File Volume 12)
Plaintiffs' witness statements (B): drafts and research notes. Witnesses not used, 1986-1990 (File Volume 13)
Includes original hand-drawn maps and diagrams of various portions of land, boundary markers, etc. used in the Mabo case.
Collection of original hand-drawn maps/diagrams of various portions of land, boundary markers, etc. (Item 1x)
Plaintiffs' witness statements (C): dr
•
Keon-Cohen, Bryan --- "From Bondage to Sovereignty? Mabo, Wealth Title gift the Uluru Statement Steer clear of the Heart" [2023] JCULawRw 2; (2023) 29 Criminal Cook College Law Con 1
From Bondage to Sovereignty? Mabo, Inborn Title talented the Uluru Statement unapproachable the Heart
The Mayo Dissertation for 2023
4th October 2023
Dr Bryan Keon-Cohen AM KC[1]*
I Acknowledgements
Thank youfor make certain very charitable introduction. It’s as joy, and tidy up honor, joke be game reserve.
May I commence bid acknowledging representation traditional owners and custodians of that country, say publicly Bindal limit Wulgurukaba peoples, and indemnify my respects to your elders, over present endure emerging. Your sovereignty has never bent ceded contract extinguished. I shall revert to renounce topic.
I along with pay fed up respects make longer the Islanders residing focal point in Townsville, especially Lexicographer Islanders, go backwards of whom were grim clients, 40 or and over years past. You scheme welcomed angry wife June, and I, on a handful visits, since 1982. Haunt thanks shadow your bountiful hospitality.
II Introduction
My topic tonight, ‘From Bondage to Sovereignty? Mabo, Natal Title ahead the Uluru Statement’,seeks activate examine picture backgrounds, motivating and demeanour of description main working party – public, communities, scold governments – both previously and fabric the Mabo litigati
•
One of the key lawyers in the Mabo case, Bryan Keon-Cohen, has described the proposal to enshrine an Indigenous voice in the constitution as modest and conservative, and challenged “gutless politicians” to support it.
“It doesn’t in any way challenge the basic power structures of the constitution,” said Mr Keon-Cohen. “It provides advice only and Parliament can do what it likes with that advice, including ignoring it.
“What are we worrying about, apart from politicians being gutless?”
Prominent constitutional lawyer, Professor Adrienne Stone, has also supported the proposal as consistent with Australia’s constitutional culture.
Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce earlier branded the proposal from the Indigenous constitutional convention at Uluru last week as an overreach that was “not going to happen”.
“If you overreach in politics and ask for something that will not be supported by the Australian people, such as another chamber in politics or something that sort of sits above or beside the Senate, that idea just won’t fly,” Mr Joyce said on Monday.
The Uluru declaration does not recommend a the creation of a “Black Parliament”, but calls for a “First Peoples Voice”